A- de 2020
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera
✓Claimant Miguel Cristobal Silva Patiño
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se confirma en su integridad el auto recurrido
- Incumplimiento de requisitos mínimos para la admisión
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica.
El rechazo de la demanda se dio porque el escrito de subsanación no logró corregir la falta de claridad, certeza, especificidad, pertinencia y suficiencia advertidas en la providencia de inadmisión.
Por estar conforme con las argumentaciones del magistrado sustanciador, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió CONFIRMAR en su integridad el auto cuestionado.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR en su integridad el Auto del 3 de julio de 2020, proferido por el magistrado sustanciador Carlos Bernal Pulido, mediante el cual se rechazo a demanda de inconstitucionalidad interpuesta por el senor Miguel Cristobal Silva Patino (Exp. D-13745).
- SEGUNDO. A traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, comuniquese el contenido de esta decision al demandante, indicandole que contra esta no procede recurso alguno.
- TERCERO. Ejecutoriada esta decision, archivese el expediente.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.